


The Audio Follow Video (AFV) function will automatically track sources as they are transitioned to program. Maintain consistent 24-bit broadcast-quality audio with sample-rate conversion on AES and SDI inputs 1-6. RAVE provides powerful audio contouring tools including independent parametric EQ and compression/limiting on each mixer channel. Flexible output routing allows main, monitor, or custom aux mixes to be assigned to any SDI or analog output. RAVE stereo faders can access any of the 8 embedded audio pairs available in each SDI input or be configured as L-L or R-R for “mono” applications. The channel count for a fully-loaded system is an astounding 276 available audio inputs.
#CARBONITE COST SECOND COMPUTER PC#
The RAVE audio mixer can access all 16 channels of each SDI input, as well as audio from internal PC sources and optional analog Audio Breakout Modules. *UHD ME1 requires standard ADD-ME2 license, UHD ME2 requires standard ADD-ME3 license.Ĭarbonite Ultra’s internal RAVE audio mixer provides serious tools to overcome seriously demanding audio challenges.
#CARBONITE COST SECOND COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENSE#


I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021." We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. Its public cloud support can be improved.
